Posted by: Dylan Stafford | March 21, 2012

Baby Boy 2

It’s 7:05AM and Jackson’s still sleeping, so this will be a short blog. Marisa is in Milwaukee today, delivering a Diversity Training. She’ll get home tonight about 10PM.

Things are looking positive for our adoption. There are checks and balances that happen and it appears an important one took place yesterday. Not time to celebrate yet, but cautiously optimistic, chance of sunshine.

In my journal this morning, I opened it up to a fresh page, empty on both sides. On the left hand page I put “Worries” and on the right hand page I put “Wonder.”

I then proceeded to empty all my thoughts on paper, on the left side the doubts and fears and worries and on the right side the amazing possibilities of adopting.

I made a graph on the right side about the next twenty years, showing my age, Jackson’s age and Baby Boy’s age. Marisa’s age was not included, as she’s settled into a holding pattern at 29-in-perpetuity  :-).

The graph looks like this, adjusting for the April birthdays of Jackson and me:

Year           Me          Jackson            Baby Boy
2012          43                 5                       0
2017          48                10                       5
2022          53                15                      10
2027          58                20                     15
2032          63                25                     20

At first I had a heart-attack realizing I’ll be 63 in 20 years–but after that I got excited about the years from 2022 to 2032, having two sons growing from ages from 15 and 10–to 25 and 20–in a decade. That seems like it could be a beautiful epoch for two brothers to share, and their parents.

Wow.

This is an amazing journey, this adoption thing. Nothing’s official. This may not happen. OR. We could be days away from bringing a new child into our family.

The big thing I learned when I first became a parent with Jackson is that I’m not very patient. I’m more patient now, Jackson’s taught me that, but still, this waiting to learn the result with the adoption process is a whole new exercise in patience.

However it goes, it is going to be the way it is supposed to go. <cliché alert> I’m doing my best to be in the moment, to not get attached to any one particular outcome, to trust the process. I feel like I’m going to explode, but in a good way.

I joke with my wife that we have to get “new charts” because being married to her is “off the charts.” I’ve joked about this for years, both because it’s a funny metaphor to me, and because it’s true. The goofy things I thought were important when I was a teenager and in my twenties, the things I thought mattered between a man and a woman, those are not the things I appreciate in being married now.

The teenage thoughts I might have had about an “off the charts” marriage, those were tiny thoughts compared to the real thing.

I love having a partner. I love it that my partner is Marisa. I love it that she was “willing to be willing” to go down this adoption road together. It’s like I can’t believe how fortunate I am to be married, to be married to her. Like who is this amazing person I just happen to have been with for a decade?

When I consulted with Dr. Kerr last week about adopting, Dr. Kerr who was our OBGYN and delivered Jackson, she gave me this perspective about welcoming a second child into your life.

“It’s like the Grinch. Your heart will grow another size. You won’t believe how much love will arise. You’ll be amazed at your wife and she will be amazed at you,” she said.

I’ll take that. If Dr. Seuss says it, it’s gotta be true.

 

Posted by: Dylan Stafford | March 19, 2012

Baby Boy

Last Wednesday I held a baby, a two-day-old infant who might become our son.

We’ve known it could go this way–we’re pre-approved, adoption-waiting parents–but when it happens it’s still like a huge wave lifting and tilting our lives. It’s jarring.

Tuesday Marisa got a call from our adoption agency: a boy was born Monday in a Los Angeles hospital, the birth mom wanted to place the baby for adoption and she had chosen our family. We were given some details and posed the question, “Are you open to this baby?”

Marisa called me at work with the news. I was having lunch with our mutual friend Jen, who coaches me on my career. Jen was one of Marisa’s bridesmaids at our wedding.

Marisa told me the details she’d gotten from our case worker. “What do you think?” she asked. “They want to meet us at 7:00 AM tomorrow morning before the birth mom gets discharged from the hospital.”

“OK,” I replied. I got emotional for a second, Jen’s a champion for our marriage and it was extra special hearing the news with her.

Then I had to set emotions aside. That night I was the main speaker for a UCLA recruiting event with 115 people registered to attend. How would I do the meet-and-greet and deliver my speech when all I wanted was to drop everything and go home and be with Marisa? I was going to need some of Bill Clinton’s famous (or infamous) ability to compartmentalize to get through the evening.

The speech went well and I took home leftover appetizers from the meet-and-greet in a styrofoam box, my post-9:00 PM dinner.

Marisa was on the couch waiting. We had house guests, Marisa’s girlfriend Nancy and her two kids had driven from Arizona to spend spring break with us. Nancy politely asked if we needed privacy but it was actually helpful having another mom listening. I sat on the carpet and nibbled my reheated quesadilla strips and ate onion-heavy guacamole. We talked quietly so our voices wouldn’t carry to the not-yet-sleeping kids.

We made a plan that Nancy tell the kids in the morning that Marisa and Dylan had a meeting. Wednesday was supposed to be Legoland day, but she was confident she could redirect their expectations. I was suspect, that seemed like changing Christmas, but she has two kids and the corollary ninja mommy-skills.

Wednesday I woke at 4:30, a full hour before my alarm. Normally I meditate for twenty minutes. I sit cross-legged in our living room, but it was Nancy’s guest room this week so I sat in the bathroom under the ceiling heat lamp, warm but annoyingly bright.

A saint said, “I meditate an hour every day, except when I am extremely busy. On those days I meditate two hours.”

That quote nudged me to sit longer than my regular 20 minutes. I could only make half an hour as I was anxious to get the day moving. The stillness of the meditation yielded one gold nugget, as always.

Have God enter that hospital room before you; follow him in. That was the advice my sponsor gave me for my wedding day. He’d told me to invite God into the marriage first, to follow him and take his guidance to be a husband. It’s worked for 8+ years in my marriage and it seemed like great advice for today.

Marisa came into the bathroom to take her shower. We wondered what we should wear. Jeans? Khakis? What was appropriate? We didn’t know.

We got dressed and left the house full of three still-sleeping kids. We wanted to miss traffic and we had to find a new hospital we’d never been to before. Our case worker called us during our drive and we helped each other with directions. She suggested we bring flowers and we made a detour to pick up a bouquet.

Again, like choosing clothes, there was the question. “What kind of flowers are appropriate for something like this?” We chose a round bouquet in a glass vase with light purple roses, hydrangea and accent flowers. I got a chocolate covered donut nearby as I’d not eaten any breakfast.

We found the hospital. We found the parking. We found our case workers and sat in the lobby for fifteen minutes getting more background information about how the night before had gone for the birthmom and for baby boy. When there was nothing more to say they looked at us, “Ready?”

“Ready,” we replied as we stood and gathered the bouquet and walked to the elevator bank.

We rode up to the maternity ward and found our room. I took a breath and remembered the meditation. God, I’m following you into this, I said to myself.

What happened inside was private. This may be the baby we adopt. It may not be. The people we met are very real but will remain anonymous.

The birth mother was young. She was beautiful and she looked both peaceful and lost at the same time. She had her mom with her. I was grateful that she had support. We hugged and there were smiles and we all sort of spread out on the hospital room furniture in a rough circle.

Baby boy was brought in a few minutes later by the nursing staff. Birth mom fed him a bottle while we all watched and talked and got to know each other.

He ate half a bottle and seemed satisfied and birth mom asked Marisa, “Would you like to hold him?”

Marisa said yes and baby boy was in her arms. I watched my wife holding an infant again and thought how fast the almost five years have flown since Jackson’s birth. He stayed in her arms about 15 minutes and then a diaper change was in order.

After the diapering I got to hold baby boy and I held him for what seemed like half an hour though I can’t be sure. It was long enough for me to get tired standing, to borrow the glider to sit and hold him. He took the other half of his bottle from me.

His eyes were closed the whole time, both while he fed and after as went back  to sleep. He was precious.

My cousin Joel and my good friend Jeff have both adopted, twice each. They each independently told me that the moment you receive your child, when you are told that this is your child, that you feel it 100%. You are the parent in that moment and you know it to your core.

Holding this baby in my arms, I didn’t feel that. He was precious, but he was not ours. Again, I set the emotions to the side. I was attempting to be in the moment, to be of service to this birthmom who was going through this huge transition, and to keep both my eyes and heart open in parallel.

The birth mom and the new grandmother were attractive people. I told myself this shouldn’t matter, but I couldn’t help thinking, “This child would resemble Marisa, with light eyes, based on looking at the birth mom and her mom. He might look like Jackson.”

Sobriety 101 taught me to stay in the moment, to be here now.

This was a match meeting. That was all.

Our case workers told us that match meetings rarely happen in the hospital. They prefer a neutral location like their office, not a hospital or a home.

They told us that match meetings rarely have the baby present. The purpose of a match meeting is to empower the birth mom that she is choosing a future for her child that she can live with for the rest of her life. The match meeting supports the birth mom feeling that she made the best choice for her baby.

We weren’t in an office, but rather the hospital, and baby boy was in my arms taking a bottle. We were doing it this way at the birth mom’s request and our adoption agency always defers to the wishes of the birth mom.

The morning was beautiful. It was Holy. It was a lot to be with.

We took our leave after two hours together. There are steps that have to be taken now that are outside of our control. There are checks and balances and they have to run their course.

The adoption agency talks about the triangle of the birth mom, the baby and the new family. No solution is a good solution unless it takes care of all three points of the triangle. The words of the serenity prayer fit, as per usual:

God, grant me the Serenity,
to accept the things I cannot change,
Courage, to change the things I can,
and Wisdom to know the difference.

Posted by: Dylan Stafford | March 8, 2012

Kindergarten-104, Red-Shirting

It’s March 2012, the Year of Kindergarten, the year our five-year old son should enter kindergarten. I say should because I’ve recently learned of red-shirting kindergarteners, purposefully waiting an extra year and beginning kindergarten at six-years-old instead of five.

Sixty Minutes, serendipitously, had a segment on red-shirting last Sunday night. They talked about Malcolm Gladwell and his book Outliers and his article about the hockey-player stars in Canada. He found that the Canadian hockey system biases towards older kids, the ones born at the beginning of the eligibility year. They’re older, so they’re bigger, so they get special attention, so they get more practice, so they get better, so they get more playing time, and they become stars. The younger, smaller kids get the opposite. He argues it is arbitrary, that the Canadian system creates a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Gladwell’s logic is crossing the border from Canada and hockey into the US and kindergarten. Parents and schools are choosing to hold back some five-year olds an extra year, arguing it will prevent the kids being unduly stressed by being the youngest in their class.

Here in Los Angeles, my wife and I have our name in the hat for six kindergartens. Six! Do we really need that many choices? We’re trying to be research our options and choose the best school for our son. But aren’t we maybe making ourselves just a little bit crazy?

So far we’ve been admitted to one school, we’ve been red-shirt-recommended at one school and we’re waiting on the four other schools.

The red-shirt-recommendation was our first reply and it caught me off guard because prior to that I’d never even heard of holding a kindergartener back a year.

On President’s Day, we took Jackson to a strip-mall in Orange County and he took a thirty-minute Kindergarten Readiness Evaluation. While we sat in the waiting room, Jackson met with a woman who administered his Kindergarten-SAT. She asked him questions. She tossed him a ball. She had him write his name.

The test looked at nine criteria. We got the report back the next week and it said Jackson was ahead for his age on seven criteria and behind for his age on two criteria. Jackson’s fine- and gross-motor skills are underdeveloped and the recommendation was that an extra year of kindergarten could help him avoid undue stress.

I was confused when I heard the result. I’d never heard of waiting to start kindergarten until that very moment, and now it was being recommended for my son. I tried to stay open-minded, to look at what’s best for Jackson and not let my pride flare up.

Oh shit, my son’s not ready for kindergarten. I’ve failed as a parent and we haven’t even started school yet… As dubious a luxury as that negative thinking might be, it wasnt’ going to help make a good decision.

In parallel to our kindergarten application effort, my day job at UCLA is to be an admission director in the business school there. So I’m living school admissions personally and professionally, 24-7, this winter.

At UCLA I evaluate thirty-year-old adults who want to earn their MBA while they continue to work full-time. I know that admission decisions are difficult. I know that I can’t admit someone who doesn’t show the evidence that they can succeed in graduate-level study, at UCLA, while they continue to work a full-time job.

I can’t “fall in love with an application” and argue to the faculty committee that we should admit the person if they don’t have a solid baseline of academic achievement.

Ok…  And, I know that there is inherent subjectivity in the process. We do the best we can to use evidence-based decision-making. We have test scores and transcripts and resumes, essays and recommendations and interviews. We don’t machine-grade applications.

We want a class of people who can do graduate school and who want to do graduate school. And we have a whole lifetime of accomplishments for each applicant to evaluate.

But a four-year-old? How do you decide a four-year-old is developmentally ready?

Their Kindergarten-SAT has been administered to over 100,000 children, over the last thirty years, according to the one-page brochure I read while we sat in the waiting room.

My son’s 95th percentile for height, meaning he’s taller than 9 out of 10 kids his age. If we hold him an extra year and begin kindergarten when he is six, he’ll be a head taller than all his classmates, even with them in fine- and gross-motor skills and way ahead of them in the other seven criteria.

Won’t he be bored? What is the down-side of being bigger than everyone and 18 months more mature?

I told his daycare teacher, Ms. Luz, about the red-shirt recommendation.

“Yes, Jackson has some trouble with his writing,” said Ms. Luz. “He doesn’t always like to do it. He’s still deciding if he’s right- or left-handed. But if he’s an extra year older he may get bored and kids who get bored maybe get into mischief.”

That was one concern I had and the other concern was just the fairness of it all.

Sixty Minutes rightly observed that the parent who are predominantly holding their kids back and starting kindergarten at six are affluent parents, the kind of families whose children are least at risk for trouble in school. The parents of kids from socially-economically disadvantaged backgrounds can’t afford the luxury of an extra year of daycare.

That is the part of this that bothers me the most. If a kid really needs to be held back a year, that is fine. But if there are ulterior motives, like giving affluent kids an extra advantage or to loading up a school with older kids to boost a school’s academic achievements, that seems suspect.

One of the heroes of UCLA is Coach John Wooden, one of the winningest coaches of all time in any sport, and author of the Pyramid of Success. He coached basketball in the 1960s and ’70s.

He always taught to focus on being the best you are personally capable of being. The real competition is me-vs-me, pushing myself to overcome my limits through hard-work and practice, not looking for an extra edge.

Sports Illustrated this month had a whole article about how UCLA’s current basketball program has lost its way, how lack of discipline and coddling to 18-year-old stars is eroding the legacy from Coach Wooden.

Aren’t we as a society losing our way about education? Every kid is different. And in thirteen years of K-12 education there is much more to be learned than book-smarts.

Perseverance, respect, curiosity, those are just three elements that I want our son to receive in his education. And I want those things for all kids.

My-kid-wins while your-kid-loses is not the kind of world I want to live in. That’s my concern about red-shirting, that applied too liberally, it skews the game for the majority.

I’m not a fan of red-shirting. There’s still a lot to learn about kindergarten, but I’m coming to the conclusion this one part of it isn’t something I see as to the overall good.

P.S.  Here’s a great TED talk about our obsession with the cult of the average.

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Categories